Subscription Lists

Refreshment in Refuge

    by Gina Burgess

Murder of the most heinous kind
Date Posted: March 8, 2020

There are 41 senators that are deceived into thinking that aborted babies are not worthy of medical care if they survive the abortion process.

One of the latest bills (S.311) that was put forth to protect babies that live through the abortion process. "...establishes requirements for the degree of care a health care practitioner must exercise in the event a child is born alive following an abortion or attempted abortion.

A health care practitioner who is present must (1) exercise the same degree of care as reasonably provided to another child born alive at the same gestational age, and (2) immediately admit the child to a hospital. The bill also requires a health care practitioner or other employee to immediately report any failure to comply with this requirement to law enforcement"

Twice this bill was introduced, and twice it failed the 60 votes required to make it law.

Let's get this clear. These are babies newly born that are ALIVE after attempted abortions and abortions. They survived the ordeal. They need immediate medical attention in a hospital not some clinic. In any other premature birth, the baby gets immediate and all out medical attention to save its life. And yet, men and women in our legislature are not sensitive enough to new, human life to vote for that medical attention because the birth was from an abortion process.

To allow a new born to die is heinous. Just because the child is inconvenient and unwanted.

Dr. Kermit Gosnell was convicted of murdering three infants when they were born alive after attempted abortions.

When did human life become so cheap? When did man's love for protecting the innocent grow so cold?

Here is a sobering thought. The illustrious presidential candidates that want to be the most powerful person in the world preferred to stay on the campaign trail than to return to Washington D.C. to do their job and vote on this bill. Senator Dick Durban (D) explained it away like this. "...Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren "are necessarily absent" from the vote. In essence, Durbin said that the senators' presence to protect all newborn life is not necessary, that these presidential hopefuls are not necessarily bound to protect the constitutional right-to-life of all newborn babies." (Tim Wildmon's letter from AFA) If Gosnell and 10 others were charged and convicted of murder of infants and conspiracy, why is it so difficult to pass a law that protects the right-to-life of newly born babies who survive the abortion process?

Here we see a clear and present danger to human life values that is slithering across America. When our leaders take a public stance that says human life is not even worth a presence and a vote, We the People are in big trouble. This means human life in our military, our hospitals, our general population is losing sanctitity and is no longer a priority.

That, my dear sisters and brothers in Christ, is what God meant when He said "the love of man will grow cold."

Was this article helpful?
Rate it:

"God's Words For US" from Cecelia Lester

Yahweh Shammah,

Read Article »
Biography Information:

Gina Burgess has taught Sunday School and Discipleship Training for almost three decades. (Don't tell her that makes her old.) She earned her Master's in Communication in 2013.

She is the author of several books including: When Christians Hurt Christians, The Crowns of the Believers and others available in online bookstores. She authors several columns, using her God-given talent to shine a light in a dark world. You can browse her blog at Refreshment In Refuge.

If you'd like to take a look at some Christian fiction and Christian non-fiction book reviews check out Gina's book reviews at Upon